Same architecture. Different specialization.

Kubera is the closest architectural cousin to HELM — both are manual-first, both refuse aggregator integrations, both serve solo HNW operators who refuse to share brokerage credentials. The differentiator is what each tool builds on top of that shared foundation. Kubera is a net-worth tracker across asset classes. HELM is a tax-aware decision engine with AI specialization.

Where HELM and Kubera agree

• No aggregator integration. Both refuse to log into your accounts on your behalf. Both ask you to bring the data manually (Kubera supports some optional Plaid connections; HELM does not, anywhere). The aggregator-credential breach class doesn't apply to either.
• HNW-operator audience. Both are priced for and focused on operators with $1M+ net worth, multiple account types, and complex asset structures (real estate, private equity, vesting, crypto).
• Encrypted at rest. Both encrypt your data in their respective databases.
• Multi-asset class breadth. Both handle brokerage, retirement, real estate, crypto, private investments, and "other" custom asset types.
• Beneficiary documentation. Both surface estate-planning context.

Where they diverge

Where Kubera wins

Honest answer: lower price, longer track record, and two specific feature wins.

• Auto-handoff on death. Kubera's "beneficiary upon death" feature tracks user activity and surfaces a designated heir's access when account inactivity crosses a threshold. HELM has beneficiary records but does not yet have an inactivity-triggered handoff. If estate-handoff is your top concern, Kubera ships that.
• Custom-asset specialization. Kubera's UI for non-standard assets (art collections, vehicles, domain names, collectibles) is more polished than HELM's generic "other" asset class. HELM treats those as records but doesn't model their valuation behavior.
• Lower price. $199/year versus HELM's $79–$299/month. For an operator who only wants net-worth tracking and document storage, Kubera is the cheaper choice by a meaningful margin.

Where HELM wins

• Tax-decision engine. Wash-sale detection, harvest opportunities, RMD calendar, IRA contribution helper, QSBS clock, AMT estimate. None of this exists in Kubera. If you're an operator with active brokerage decisions to make, this is the differentiator.
• Scenario modeling. Sell shares, exercise ISOs, donate appreciated shares — full LTCG bracket-stack with NIIT and AMT layers. Monte Carlo cash-flow with sequence-of-returns risk visible. Kubera does not model these.
• AI specialist. Ask HELM is a Claude 4.5 specialist trained on tax code (IRS §1091, §1202, §1031, §170, SECURE 2.0). Persistent threads, 60-day context against your portfolio. Kubera has no comparable AI.
• Banker-grade review PDF. 10-page quarterly review built for the operator's CPA, banker, or refi conversation. Kubera has a generic export but not a structured banker-format review.
• Build cadence. Daily build-in-public ships at . Kubera ships less visibly. If you want a tool whose roadmap is actively widening, HELM compounds faster.

Who should pick which

Kubera fits if: $1M–$10M+ NW, primary need is multi-asset net-worth tracking, you value the auto-handoff-on-death feature, you have unusual custom assets (art, vehicles, domains), price is the tiebreaker.

HELM fits if: $1M–$10M+ NW, you have active tax decisions to make (wash sales, harvest, AMT, QSBS, RMD), you want AI specialization for portfolio thinking, you want Monte Carlo cash-flow + scenario modeling, you want a banker-grade quarterly PDF for CPA/refi conversations.

See all HELM comparisons →